anarkismi

ilman pakottamista ja kontrollia kuinka pitkälle libertaarisen sosialismin tai anarkismin menestys pohjautuu ihmisen luonteen perustavanlaatuiseen muutokseen motivaation ja epäitsekkyyden osalta mutta myös tiedon ja sivistyksen osalta?

But during the period in which it was alive, I think it was an inspiring testimony to the ability of poor working people to organise and manage their affairs extremely successfully, without coercion or control. How far does the success of libertarian socialism or anarchism as a way of life really depend on a fundamental change in the nature of man, both in his motivation, his altruism, and also in his knowledge and sophistication?

-Eikö se jo ole anarkismia?

- Isn't that a form of anarchism?

Hän kannattaa anarkismia, naurettavaa mutta tuhoisaa aatetta.

He is an advocate of anarchism, an absurd yet devastating idealism.